Aluminum blood concentration in adult patients: effect of multichamber-bag versus hospital-compounded parenteral nutrition / Concentración sanguínea de aluminio en pacientes adultos: efecto de la nutrición parenteral tricameral frente a la nutrición parenteral elaborada en el hospital

Background: the administration of aluminum-contaminated parenteral nutrition (PN) leads to an accumulation of aluminum. The aim of this study was to assess blood aluminum concentrations (BACs) of inpatients receiving multichamber-bag (MCB) PN compared to those receiving compounded PN. Methods: available BACs were retrospectively gathered from patient charts of adult inpatients receiving PN from 2015 to 2020, and compared depending on the type of PN administered. Long-term PN patients, defined as ≥ 20 days of PN, receiving at least > 10 days of compounded PN, were compared to long-term patients receiving only MCB. Results: a total of 160 BACs were available from 110 patients. No differences were found according to type of PN (mean BAC: 3.11 ± 2.75 for MCB versus 3.58 ± 2.08 µg/L for compounded PN). Baseline total bilirubin, surgery and days with PN were related to higher BACs (coefficient: 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.42], 1.29 [95 % CI, 0.52-2.07], and 0.06 [95 % CI: 0.01-0.11], respectively). Regarding long-term PN, patients receiving only MCB (n = 21) showed lower BACs compared to the compounded PN (n = 17) [2.99 ± 1.55 versus 4.35 ± 2.17 µg/L, respectively; p < 0.05]. Conclusions: although there were no differences in BAC according to type of PN administered, in long-term PN, MCB PN was associated with lower BACs as compared to compounded PN. (AU)

Antecedentes: la administración de nutrición parenteral (NP) contaminada con aluminio conduce a su acumulación. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las concentraciones de aluminio en sangre (CAS) en pacientes hospitalizados que recibieron NP elaboradas en el hospital o bolsas tricamerales. Métodos: se recogieron retrospectivamente las CAS disponibles de los pacientes hospitalizados con NP durante el período entre 2015 y 2020, comparándose los valores en función del tipo de NP administrada. Se comparan igualmente los valores de pacientes de larga duración, definida como ≥ 20 días de NP, que recibieron al menos > 10 días de NP elaborada frente aquellos de larga duración que recibieron solo NP tricameral. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 160 CAS de 110 pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias con respecto al tipo de NP (CAS media: 3,11 ± 2,75 para la tricameral frente a 3,58 ± 2,08 µg/L para la elaborada). La bilirrubina total basal, la cirugía y los días con NP se relacionaron con un mayor valor de CAS (coeficiente: 0,30 [IC 95 %: 0,18-0,42], 1,29 [IC 95 %: 0,52-2,07] y 0,06 [IC 95 %: 0,01-0,11], respectivamente). En la NP a largo plazo, los pacientes que recibieron solo NP tricameral (n = 21) mostraron una CAS menor en comparación con el grupo que recibió al menos 10 NP elaboradas (n = 17) [2,99 ± 1,55 versus 4,35 ± 2,17 µg/L, respectivamente; p < 0,05]. Conclusiones: aunque no hubo diferencias de CAS con respecto al tipo de NP administrada, en la NP a largo plazo, la administración de NP tricameral se asoció con CAS menores en comparación con la NP elaborada. (AU)

Evidence-based recommendations of the Andalusian Group for Nutrition Reflection and Investigation (GARIN) for the management of adult patients with short bowel syndrome / Recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia del Grupo Andaluz para la Reflexión e Investigación en Nutrición (GARIN) para el manejo del paciente con síndrome de intestino corto

In order to develop evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus for the nutritional management of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS), we conducted a systematic literature search using the PRISMA methodology plus a critical appraisal following the GRADE scale procedures. Pharmacological treatment with antisecretory drugs, antidiarrheal drugs, and somatostatin contributes to reducing intestinal losses. Nutritional support is based on parenteral nutrition; however, oral intake and/or enteral nutrition should be introduced as soon as possible. In the chronic phase, the diet should have as few restrictions as possible, and be adapted to the SBS type. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) should be individualized. Single-lumen catheters are recommended and taurolidine should be used for locking the catheter. The HPN's lipid content must be greater than 1 g/kg per week but not exceed 1 g/kg per day, and omega-6 fatty acids (ω6 FAs) should be reduced. Trace element vials with low doses of manganese should be used. Patients with chronic SBS who require long-term HPN/fluid therapy despite optimized treatment should be considered for teduglutide treatment. All patients require a multidisciplinary approach and specialized follow-up. These recommendations and suggestions regarding nutritional management in SBS patients have direct clinical applicability. (AU)

Con el fin de desarrollar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia y el consenso de expertos para el manejo nutricional de los pacientes con síndrome de intestino corto (SIC), realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática utilizando la metodología PRISMA junto a una valoración crítica siguiendo los procedimientos de la escala GRADE. El tratamiento farmacológico con fármacos antisecretores, antidiarreicos y somatostatina contribuye a reducir las pérdidas intestinales. El apoyo nutricional se basa en la nutrición parenteral; sin embargo, la ingesta oral y/o la nutrición enteral deben introducirse lo antes posible. En la fase crónica, la dieta debe tener las menores restricciones posibles y adaptarse al tipo de SIC. La nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD) debe individualizarse. Se recomiendan catéteres de un solo lumen y se debe utilizar taurolidina para bloquear el catéter. El contenido de lípidos de la HPN debe ser superior a 1 g/kg por semana, pero no debe exceder 1 g/kg por día, y debe reducirse el ácido graso omega-6 (AG ω6). Deben utilizarse viales de oligoelementos con dosis bajas de manganeso. Los pacientes con SIC crónico que requieren NPD/fluidoterapia a largo plazo a pesar del tratamiento optimizado deben considerarse para el tratamiento con teduglutida. Todos los pacientes requieren un abordaje multidisciplinar y un seguimiento especializado. Estas recomendaciones y sugerencias con respecto al manejo nutricional de los pacientes con SIC tienen aplicabilidad clínica directa. (AU)

Evidence-based recommendations of the Andalusian Group for Nutrition Reflection and Investigation (GARIN) for the management of adult patients with short bowel syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: In order to develop evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus for the nutritional management of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS), we conducted a systematic literature search using the PRISMA methodology plus a critical appraisal following the GRADE scale procedures. Pharmacological treatment with antisecretory drugs, antidiarrheal drugs, and somatostatin contributes to reducing intestinal losses. Nutritional support is based on parenteral nutrition; however, oral intake and/or enteral nutrition should be introduced as soon as possible. In the chronic phase, the diet should have as few restrictions as possible, and be adapted to the SBS type. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) should be individualized. Single-lumen catheters are recommended and taurolidine should be used for locking the catheter. The HPN's lipid content must be greater than 1 g/kg per week but not exceed 1 g/kg per day, and omega-6 fatty acids (ω6 FAs) should be reduced. Trace element vials with low doses of manganese should be used. Patients with chronic SBS who require long-term HPN/fluid therapy despite optimized treatment should be considered for teduglutide treatment. All patients require a multidisciplinary approach and specialized follow-up. These recommendations and suggestions regarding nutritional management in SBS patients have direct clinical applicability.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Con el fin de desarrollar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia y el consenso de expertos para el manejo nutricional de los pacientes con síndrome de intestino corto (SIC), realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática utilizando la metodología PRISMA junto a una valoración crítica siguiendo los procedimientos de la escala GRADE. El tratamiento farmacológico con fármacos antisecretores, antidiarreicos y somatostatina contribuye a reducir las pérdidas intestinales. El apoyo nutricional se basa en la nutrición parenteral; sin embargo, la ingesta oral y/o la nutrición enteral deben introducirse lo antes posible. En la fase crónica, la dieta debe tener las menores restricciones posibles y adaptarse al tipo de SIC. La nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD) debe individualizarse. Se recomiendan catéteres de un solo lumen y se debe utilizar taurolidina para bloquear el catéter. El contenido de lípidos de la HPN debe ser superior a 1 g/kg por semana, pero no debe exceder 1 g/kg por día, y debe reducirse el ácido graso omega-6 (AG ω6). Deben utilizarse viales de oligoelementos con dosis bajas de manganeso. Los pacientes con SIC crónico que requieren NPD/fluidoterapia a largo plazo a pesar del tratamiento optimizado deben considerarse para el tratamiento con teduglutida. Todos los pacientes requieren un abordaje multidisciplinar y un seguimiento especializado. Estas recomendaciones y sugerencias con respecto al manejo nutricional de los pacientes con SIC tienen aplicabilidad clínica directa.

Differential DNA methylation by early versus late parenteral nutrition in the PICU: a biological basis for its impact on emotional and behavioral problems documented 4 years later.

BACKGROUND: The PEPaNIC multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) has shown that early administration of supplemental parenteral nutrition (early-PN) as compared with withholding PN for 1 week (late-PN) induced long-term internalizing, externalizing and total emotional/behavioral problems in critically ill children, as observed 4 years later. Early-PN was further shown to alter the methylation status of 37 CpG-sites in leukocyte DNA between admission and discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). In a preplanned subanalysis of the PEPaNIC trial, we now investigated whether the altered methylation of these CpG-sites could statistically explain the negative impact of early-PN on emotion/behavior documented 4 years after PICU admission. RESULTS: The combination of DNA methylation data and data on behavior 4 years after PICU admission was available for 403 of the 1440 patients (aged 0-17 years at PICU admission) who were included in the PEPaNIC RCT (192 early-PN and 211 late-PN patients). Mediation analyses with use of bootstrapped multivariable non-linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors revealed that the adverse alterations by early-PN in methylation of the 37 CpG-sites together statistically explained its harmful impact on internalizing, externalizing and total emotional/behavioral problems. When adding the methylation status of the 37 CpG-sites to the models, the explanatory power improved with a 1.710 to 1.851-fold increase, and the impact of the altered methylation status of the CpG-sites explained the impact of the randomization to early-PN versus late-PN. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal DNA methylation induced by the early use of PN in the PICU provides a biological basis for its long-term harmful effect on emotion/behavior of critically ill children 4 years after PICU admission. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01536275, registered February 17, 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01536275 .

Current practice in nutrition after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - Results from a survey among hematopoietic stem cell transplant centers.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is frequently associated with impaired oral intake and malnutrition, which potentially increases morbidity and mortality. Therefore, nutrition is one of the major challenges in the post-transplant period. METHODS: To document the current clinical approach in nutritional treatment, we designed a questionnaire concerning the current practice in nutrition after alloHSCT and distributed it to German speaking centers performing alloHSCT in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between November 2018 and March 2020. Twenty-eight (39%) of 72 contacted centers completed the survey, 23 from Germany, two from Austria and three from Switzerland, representing 50% of alloHSCT activity within the participating countries in 2018. RESULTS: All centers reported having nutritional guidelines for patients undergoing alloHSCT, whereby 86% (n = 24) provided a low-microbial diet during the neutropenic phase. The criteria to start parenteral nutrition (PN) directly after alloHSCT seemed to be consistent, 75% (n = 21) of the corresponding centers started PN if the oral nutritional intake or the bodyweight dropped below a certain limit. In the setting of intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) the current practice appeared to be more heterogenous. About 64% (n = 18) of the centers followed a special diet, added food stepwise modulated by GvHD symptoms, while only four centers regularly stopped oral intake completely (intestinal GvHD grade >1). Half of the centers (54%, n = 15) applied a lactose-free diet, followed by 43% (n = 12) which provided fat- and 18% (n = 5) gluten-free food in patients with intestinal GvHD. Supplementation of micronutrients in acute intestinal GvHD patients was performed by 54% (n = 15) of the centers, whereas vitamin D (89%, n = 25) and vitamin B12 (68%, n = 19) was added regularly independently of the presence of GvHD. Only 5 (18%) participating centers ever observed a food-associated infection during hospitalization, whereas food-associated infections were reported to occur more often in the outpatient setting (64%, n = 18). CONCLUSION: The survey documented a general consensus about the need for nutritional guidelines for patients undergoing alloHSCT. However, the nutritional treatment in clinical practice (i.e. lactose-, gluten- or fat-free in intestinal GvHD) as well as the use of food supplements was very heterogeneous. In line with current general recommendations the centers seemed to focus on safe food handling practice rather than providing a strict neutropenic diet. More high-quality data are required to provide evidence-based nutrition to patients during and after alloHSCT.

Formulación de nutrición parenteral neonatal: ¿dónde estamos? / Neonatal parenteral nutrition formulation: where are we?

INTRODUCCIÓN: la instauración de nutrición parenteral al prematuro ha supuesto un importante avance en su pronóstico. Los últimos años han sido muy fructíferos en cuanto a la publicación de guías en este ámbito. OBJETIVOS: conocer los procedimientos de formulación y elaboración de las nutriciones parenterales neonatales (NPN) en los hospitales españoles. MÉTODOS: se llevó a cabo una encuesta multicéntrica dirigida a los servicios de farmacia sobre los procesos anteriormente citados. RESULTADOS: 55 hospitales cumplieron criterios de inclusión. El 51 % disponía de sistemas informáticos de prescripción, y el 65,5 % formulaba siempre de forma individualizada, mientras que el 34,4 % disponía de fórmulas prediseñadas. Los preparados tricamerales eran utilizados por el 13,0 %. En el 52,7 % de los casos se preparaban las nutriciones de primer día bajo demanda, y ésta se iniciaba antes de las 8 horas de vida en un 88,1 % de los casos. El fosfato inorgánico era la primera opción en un 10,4 %. Se añadían diariamente vitaminas, oligoelementos y zinc en el 92,7 %, 90,9 % y 70,9 % de los casos, respectivamente. El 45,4 % de los hospitales elaboraba siempre las NPPN incluyendo los lípidos en la misma bolsa, frente al 34,5 % en los que estos se administraban por separado en todos los casos. El 50,9 % de los hospitales nunca añadía heparina a sus nutriciones. Las bolsas fotoprotectoras eran utilizadas por un 89,1 %. La estabilidad de las nutriciones variaba desde 24 horas a 15 días. CONCLUSIONES: la elaboración de la NPN en España está sujeta a gran variabilidad. Existe controversia respecto al uso de heparina y mezclas ternarias, reflejada en la variabilidad de la práctica clínica

INTRODUCTION: the introduction of parenteral nutrition in preterm infants has meant a major advance in their prognosis, being the last few years very fruitful in terms of publication of guidelines in this area. OBJECTIVES: to know the formulation and preparation procedures of neonatal parenteral nutrition (NPN) in Spanish hospitals. METHODS: a multi-centre survey was conducted in Pharmacy Services on the aforementioned processes. RESULTS: fifty-five hospitals met inclusion criteria. Electronic prescription systems were use by 51 %, 65.5 % always formulated individually, while 34.4 % had predesigned formulas. Tricameral preparations were used by 13.0 %. In 52.7 % of cases, first day nutrition was prepared on demand, starting before 8 hours of life in 88.1 % of cases. Inorganic phosphate was the first option in 10.4 %, vitamins, trace elements and zinc were added daily in 92.7 %, 90.9 % and 70.9 % of cases, respectively. NPN including lipids in the same bag was formulated by 45.4 % of the hospitals, compared to 34.5 % where it was administered separately in all cases. In 50.9 % of hospitals they never added heparin to their NPN. The 89.1 % used photoprotected bags. The stability of the admixture varied from 24 hours to 15 days. CONCLUSION: the elaboration of the PPN in Spain is subject to great variability. There is controversy regarding the use of heparin and ternary mixtures, which is reflected in the variability of clinical practice

Neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas, candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas / Neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition who are candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition

OBJETIVO: cuantificar el número de pacientes neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas (NPI), candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas (NPE), así como el número de días. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo observacional y descriptivo de cohortes. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: pacientes neonatos con indicación de nutrición parenteral (NP) y prescripción individualizada. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: pacientes que no hubieran iniciado la diuresis, con necesidades nutricionales específicas, con alteraciones del equilibrio ácido-base y/o con contraindicación de la NPE. Se emplearon variables relacionadas con el paciente (sexo, peso, semanas de gestación y días de vida) y relacionadas con el tratamiento (aportes de la NPI). Fijando como criterio de conversión el volumen de NP, se calcularon los aportes teóricos con la NPE. El criterio para que un paciente fuera candidato a recibirla fue que todos los aportes teóricos estuvieran dentro de los requerimientos de referencia. RESULTADOS: se incluyeron 33 neonatos (9 mujeres) en tratamiento con NPI y con 94 prescripciones. La mediana de peso de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fue de 2,14 (RIC: 0,9) kg, nacidos a las 35 (RIC: 3) semanas de gestación y en los que se inició NP entre los días 0 y 4. El 71 % (22/31) de los pacientes en el 54,1 % (46/85) de sus prescripciones fueron candidatos a recibir NPE administrada por vía central durante 1 a 8 días, mientras que ningún paciente fue candidato a recibirla por vía periférica. CONCLUSIONES: en nuestro centro, el 71 % de los pacientes nenonatos en tratamiento con NPI administrada por vía central son candidatos a recibir NPE, lo que fomenta la normalización del soporte nutricional en esta población

OBJETIVE: to quantify the number of neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition (IPN) who were candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition (SPN), and to calculate their treatment duration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a prospective, observational, descriptive cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: neonates with indication of parenteral nutrition (PN) and individualized prescription. Exclusion criteria included: patients who had not started diuresis, with specific nutritional needs, altered acid-base balance, and/or contraindication to receive SPN. Included variables were patient-related (gender, weight, weeks of gestation, and days of life) and treatment-related regarding IPN composition. Setting the volume of PN as the conversion criterion, theoretical contributions were calculated with the SPN. The criterion for a patient to be a candidate to receive SPN was that all the theoretical contributions calculated were within the reference requirements range. RESULTS: a total of 33 neonates (9 women) received IPN with 94 prescriptions. The median weight of the patients included in the study was 2.14 (IQR, 0.9) kg, and they were born at 35 (IQR, 3) weeks of gestation. PN began between 0 and 4 days of life. In all, 71 % (22/31) of the patients in 54.1 % of their (46/85) prescriptions were candidates to receive SPN via central administration for 1 to 8 days, whereas no patient was candidate to receive SPN via peripheral administration. CONCLUSIONS: in our center, 71 % of neonates treated with central administration of IPN are candidates to receive SPN, thus promoting the normalization of nutritional support in this population

[Neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition who are candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition]. / Neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas, candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas.

INTRODUCTION: Objetive: to quantify the number of neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition (IPN) who were candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition (SPN), and to calculate their treatment duration. Material and methods: this was a prospective, observational, descriptive cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: neonates with indication of parenteral nutrition (PN) and individualized prescription. Exclusion criteria included: patients who had not started diuresis, with specific nutritional needs, altered acid-base balance, and/or contraindication to receive SPN. Included variables were patient-related (gender, weight, weeks of gestation, and days of life) and treatment-related regarding IPN composition. Setting the volume of PN as the conversion criterion, theoretical contributions were calculated with the SPN. The criterion for a patient to be a candidate to receive SPN was that all the theoretical contributions calculated were within the reference requirements range. Results: a total of 33 neonates (9 women) received IPN with 94 prescriptions. The median weight of the patients included in the study was 2.14 (IQR, 0.9) kg, and they were born at 35 (IQR, 3) weeks of gestation. PN began between 0 and 4 days of life. In all, 71 % (22/31) of the patients in 54.1 % of their (46/85) prescriptions were candidates to receive SPN via central administration for 1 to 8 days, whereas no patient was candidate to receive SPN via peripheral administration. Conclusions: in our center, 71 % of neonates treated with central administration of IPN are candidates to receive SPN, thus promoting the normalization of nutritional support in this population.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Objetivo: cuantificar el número de pacientes neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas (NPI), candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas (NPE), así como el número de días. Material y métodos: estudio prospectivo observacional y descriptivo de cohortes. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: pacientes neonatos con indicación de nutrición parenteral (NP) y prescripción individualizada. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: pacientes que no hubieran iniciado la diuresis, con necesidades nutricionales específicas, con alteraciones del equilibrio ácido-base y/o con contraindicación de la NPE. Se emplearon variables relacionadas con el paciente (sexo, peso, semanas de gestación y días de vida) y relacionadas con el tratamiento (aportes de la NPI). Fijando como criterio de conversión el volumen de NP, se calcularon los aportes teóricos con la NPE. El criterio para que un paciente fuera candidato a recibirla fue que todos los aportes teóricos estuvieran dentro de los requerimientos de referencia. Resultados: se incluyeron 33 neonatos (9 mujeres) en tratamiento con NPI y con 94 prescripciones. La mediana de peso de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fue de 2,14 (RIC: 0,9) kg, nacidos a las 35 (RIC: 3) semanas de gestación y en los que se inició NP entre los días 0 y 4. El 71 % (22/31) de los pacientes en el 54,1 % (46/85) de sus prescripciones fueron candidatos a recibir NPE administrada por vía central durante 1 a 8 días, mientras que ningún paciente fue candidato a recibirla por vía periférica. Conclusiones: en nuestro centro, el 71 % de los pacientes nenonatos en tratamiento con NPI administrada por vía central son candidatos a recibir NPE, lo que fomenta la normalización del soporte nutricional en esta población.

Omega-3 fatty acid-containing parenteral nutrition in ICU patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acid (FA)-containing parenteral nutrition (PN) is associated with significant improvements in patient outcomes compared with standard PN regimens without ω-3 FA lipid emulsions. Here, we evaluate the impact of ω-3 FA-containing PN versus standard PN on clinical outcomes and costs in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients using a meta-analysis and subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of a hospital operating in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) and the US. METHODS: We present a pharmacoeconomic simulation based on a systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes and costs comparing ω-3 FA-containing PN with standard PN were evaluated in adult ICU patients eligible to receive PN covering at least 70% of their total energy requirements and in the subgroup of critically ill ICU patients (mean ICU stay > 48 h). The meta-analysis with the co-primary outcomes of infection rate and mortality rate was based on randomized controlled trial data retrieved via a systematic literature review; resulting efficacy data were subsequently employed in country-specific cost-effectiveness analyses. RESULTS: In adult ICU patients, ω-3 FA-containing PN versus standard PN was associated with significant reductions in the relative risk (RR) of infection (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45, 0.86; p = 0.004), hospital length of stay (HLOS) (- 3.05 days; 95% CI - 5.03, - 1.07; p = 0.003) and ICU length of stay (LOS) (- 1.89 days; 95% CI - 3.33, - 0.45; p = 0.01). In critically ill ICU patients, ω-3 FA-containing PN was associated with similar reductions in infection rates (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46, 0.94; p = 0.02), HLOS (- 3.98 days; 95% CI - 6.90, - 1.06; p = 0.008) and ICU LOS (- 2.14 days; 95% CI - 3.89, - 0.40; p = 0.02). Overall hospital episode costs were reduced in all six countries using ω-3 FA-containing PN compared to standard PN, ranging from €-3156 ± 1404 in Spain to €-9586 ± 4157 in the US. CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate that ω-3 FA-containing PN is associated with statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient outcomes. Its use is also predicted to yield cost savings compared to standard PN, rendering ω-3 FA-containing PN an attractive cost-saving alternative across different health care systems. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019129311.

Biomarkers in critical care nutrition.

The goal of nutrition support is to provide the substrates required to match the bioenergetic needs of the patient and promote the net synthesis of macromolecules required for the preservation of lean mass, organ function, and immunity. Contemporary observational studies have exposed the pervasive undernutrition of critically ill patients and its association with adverse clinical outcomes. The intuitive hypothesis is that optimization of nutrition delivery should improve ICU clinical outcomes. It is therefore surprising that multiple large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate the clinical benefit of restoring or maximizing nutrient intake. This may be in part due to the absence of biological markers that identify patients who are most likely to benefit from nutrition interventions and that monitor the effects of nutrition support. Here, we discuss the need for practical risk stratification tools in critical care nutrition, a proposed rationale for targeted biomarker development, and potential approaches that can be adopted for biomarker identification and validation in the field.

Quality and safety of parenteral nutrition for newborn and preterm infants as an on-ward preparation.

BACKGROUND: For newborn and preterm infants, standardised and individual parenteral nutrition (PN) is used. PN preparation is at risk for contamination and dosing errors. The quality of PN is crucial for infants and has a direct impact on their health status and safety. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the physicochemical and microbial quality of PN for newborn and preterm infants prepared on a neonatal ward. METHODS: Sampling of various individual PN prepared by nurses on a neonatal ward was performed. Formulations included maximal four electrolytes, variable dextrose and amino acid concentrations. Depending on the sample volume, up to three quality analyses were performed: (1) test for bacterial endotoxins by kinetic-chromogenic method, (2) sterility according to the European and US Pharmacopoeia, and (3) quantification of electrolytes by capillary electrophoresis and of dextrose by ultraviolet detection after enzymatic reaction of hexokinase. The concentrations obtained were evaluated based on the US and Swiss Pharmacopoeia specifications for compounded preparations and compared to the widened pharmacy specifications. RESULTS: The composition of 86% of the 110 analysed PN prepared by nurses on the neonatal ward corresponded to their medical prescription. 14% were out of the acceptable widened pharmacy ranges. We found no microbial contamination in the samples. All PN were free from endotoxins. CONCLUSION: Component concentrations of PN prepared on wards by nurses differed frequently and significantly from their medical prescription, and the deviation can be critical depending on the component and its mode of action. The sample size is too small to evaluate the microbial contamination.

High Frequency of Non-Compliance with Quality Indicators of Enteral and Parenteral Nutritional Therapy in Hospitalized Patients.

Quality indicators in nutritional therapy (QINT) are measures of the effectiveness and quality of nutrition support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of the QINT adequacy of Enteral Nutritional Therapy (EN) and/or Parenteral (PN) in hospitalized patients and identify the best indicators according to health professionals. A prospective study was performed, including data from patients aged 18 years or over admitted to clinical or surgical wards. The patients who had received EN and/or PN were followed from the first day of nutritional prescription until discharge. Twelve indicators were calculated, as recommended by the literature. Regarding professional opinion, the QINT adequacy was evaluated by observing its utility, simplicity, objectivity, and cost. Of the 727 hospitalized patients, 101 were on EN and/or PN. Regarding the 12 QINT evaluated, only 25% (3) achieved the goals: involuntary withdrawal of enteral feeding tube (0.01%); feeding tube occlusion or withdrawal per occlusion (0%); the measurement of energy and protein requirements (92%). A high frequency of non-compliance (75% of QINT) was observed in clinical and surgical patients on EN and/or PN. With knowledge of the six best indicators chosen by health professionals in this service, it will be possible to elaborate protocols according to the real-life situation in the institution.

Control de calidad de la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales: control gravimétrico y de productos utilizados / Quality control of parenteral nutrition compounding: gravimetric and component verification control

INTRODUCCIÓN: la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales (NP) es un proceso complejo y con alta probabilidad de aparición de errores. OBJETIVO: analizar los errores detectados en el control gravimétrico (CG) y de productos (CP) utilizados realizado en las NP elaboradas. MÉTODOS: se realizó un análisis prospectivo en el que durante tres años (enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2018) se pesaron las NP elaboradas. Se utilizó el programa informático MedicalOne Parenteral®, que calcula el peso teórico teniendo en cuenta la densidad y el volumen. Cada NP elaborada se pesaba para obtener el peso real. El error gravimétrico (%) (EG = (peso real - peso teórico) X 100 / peso teórico) se consideró correcto dentro del intervalo de ± 5 %. El CP consistía en la comprobación de los productos y los volúmenes utilizados con la hoja de elaboración. RESULTADOS: se realizó el control de 28.761 NP. Se pesaron 20.612 NP de adultos (NPA), siendo incorrectas 124 (0,6 %). De las 1203 NP de pacientes pediátricos no neonatos (NPP), 15 (1,25 %) fueron incorrectas, y de las 6946 de neonatos (NPN), 164 (2,96 %). Respecto al CP se detectaron 71 errores en las NPA (0,70 %), 6 (1,34 %) en las NPP y 5 (0,21 %) en las NPN. Los errores fueron: añadir más volumen de un componente [38 (46,34 %)], añadir menos volumen [17(20,73 %)] y producto erróneo [27 (32,93 %)]. CONCLUSIONES: el control de calidad realizado permitió detectar errores producidos durante la elaboración y evitó que llegaran al paciente. Se detectaron en el CG más NP incorrectas entre las NPN. Con el CP, el error mayoritario fue añadir más volumen de un componente

INTRODUCTION: parenteral nutrition (PN) compounding is a process with a high probability of errors. OBJECTIVE: to analyze PN compounding errors detected using a gravimetric control (GC) and a component verification control (CVC). METHODS: a prospective analysis was carried out during a three-year period (January 2016 to December 2018). The MedicalOne Parenteral® software program was used to calculate the theoretical weight of each PN based on density and volume. Each elaborated PN was weighed to obtain the real weight. Gravimetric error (%) ((real weight - theoretical weight) X 100 / theoretical weight) was considered correct if within the ± 5 % interval. The CVC consisted of checking that the correct ingredients and volumes were added according to the PN order. RESULTS: during the study period a total number of 28,761 PNs were checked out; 20,612 adult PNs (APN) were weighed and 124 were considered incorrect (0.60 %). Of the 1,203 non-neonatal pediatric PNs (NPPN), 15 (1.25 %) were incorrect, and of the 6,946 neonatal PNs (NPN), 164 (2.96 %) were incorrect. Regarding the CVC, 71 errors were detected in the APN (0.70 %), 6 (1.34 %) in the NPPN, and 5 (0.21 %) in the NPN group. The total number of errors included: adding more volume of one component [38 (46.34 %)], adding a wrong component [27 (32.93 %)], and absent volume of one component [17 (20.73 %)]. CONCLUSIONS: the quality control carried out allowed to detect errors during the preparation of PNs and prevented them from reaching the patient. More incorrect NPNs were detected through GC. The main error detected with CVC was adding more volume of a component

[Quality control of parenteral nutrition compounding: gravimetric and component verification control]. / Control de calidad de la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales: control gravimétrico y de productos utilizados.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: parenteral nutrition (PN) compounding is a process with a high probability of errors. Objective: to analyze PN compounding errors detected using a gravimetric control (GC) and a component verification control (CVC). Methods: a prospective analysis was carried out during a three-year period (January 2016 to December 2018). The MedicalOne Parenteral® software program was used to calculate the theoretical weight of each PN based on density and volume. Each elaborated PN was weighed to obtain the real weight. Gravimetric error (%) ((real weight - theoretical weight) x 100 / theoretical weight) was considered correct if within the ± 5 % interval. The CVC consisted of checking that the correct ingredients and volumes were added according to the PN order. Results: during the study period a total number of 28,761 PNs were checked out; 20,612 adult PNs (APN) were weighed and 124 were considered incorrect (0.60 %). Of the 1,203 non-neonatal pediatric PNs (NPPN), 15 (1.25 %) were incorrect, and of the 6,946 neonatal PNs (NPN), 164 (2.96 %) were incorrect. Regarding the CVC, 71 errors were detected in the APN (0.70 %), 6 (1.34 %) in the NPPN, and 5 (0.21 %) in the NPN group. The total number of errors included: adding more volume of one component [38 (46.34 %)], adding a wrong component [27 (32.93 %)], and absent volume of one component [17 (20.73 %)]. Conclusions: the quality control carried out allowed to detect errors during the preparation of PNs and prevented them from reaching the patient. More incorrect NPNs were detected through GC. The main error detected with CVC was adding more volume of a component.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales (NP) es un proceso complejo y con alta probabilidad de aparición de errores. Objetivo: analizar los errores detectados en el control gravimétrico (CG) y de productos (CP) utilizados realizado en las NP elaboradas. Métodos: se realizó un análisis prospectivo en el que durante tres años (enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2018) se pesaron las NP elaboradas. Se utilizó el programa informático MedicalOne Parenteral®, que calcula el peso teórico teniendo en cuenta la densidad y el volumen. Cada NP elaborada se pesaba para obtener el peso real. El error gravimétrico (%) (EG = (peso real - peso teórico) x 100 / peso teórico) se consideró correcto dentro del intervalo de ± 5 %. El CP consistía en la comprobación de los productos y los volúmenes utilizados con la hoja de elaboración. Resultados: se realizó el control de 28.761 NP. Se pesaron 20.612 NP de adultos (NPA), siendo incorrectas 124 (0,6 %). De las 1203 NP de pacientes pediátricos no neonatos (NPP), 15 (1,25 %) fueron incorrectas, y de las 6946 de neonatos (NPN), 164 (2,96 %). Respecto al CP se detectaron 71 errores en las NPA (0,70 %), 6 (1,34 %) en las NPP y 5 (0,21 %) en las NPN. Los errores fueron: añadir más volumen de un componente [38 (46,34 %)], añadir menos volumen [17(20,73 %)] y producto erróneo [27 (32,93 %)]. Conclusiones: el control de calidad realizado permitió detectar errores producidos durante la elaboración y evitó que llegaran al paciente. Se detectaron en el CG más NP incorrectas entre las NPN. Con el CP, el error mayoritario fue añadir más volumen de un componente.

Recomendaciones para el tratamiento nutrometabólico especializado del paciente crítico: sepsis y shock séptico. Grupo de Trabajo de Metabolismo y Nutrición de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) / Recommendations for specialized nutritional-metabolic treatment of the critical patient: Sepsis and septic shock. Metabolism and Nutrition Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC)

No disponible

Recomendaciones para el tratamiento nutrometabólico especializado del paciente crítico: cirugía de aparato digestivo. Grupo de Trabajo de Metabolismo y Nutrición de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) / Recommendations for specialized nutritional-metabolic management of the critical patient: Digestive tract surgery. Metabolism and Nutrition Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC)

No disponible

The Role of Preoperative Parenteral Nutrition.

Malnutrition is associated with poor surgical outcomes, and therefore optimizing nutritional status preoperatively is very important. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature related to preoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) and to provide current evidence based guidance. A systemic online search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Databases from January 1990 to February 2020 was done. Sixteen studies were included in this narrative review, including four meta-analyses and twelve clinical trials. The majority of studies have demonstrated benefits of preoperative PN on postoperative outcomes, including reduced postoperative complications (8/10 studies) and postoperative length of stay (3/4 studies). Preoperative PN is indicated in malnourished surgical patients who cannot achieve adequate nutrient intake by oral or enteral nutrition. It can be seen that most studies showing benefits of preoperative PN often included patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (10/12 studies), which gastrointestinal problems are commonly seen and enteral nutrition may be not feasible. When preoperative PN is indicated, adequate energy and protein should be provided, and patients should receive at least seven days of PN prior to surgery. The goal of preoperative PN is not weight regain, but rather repletion of energy, protein, micronutrients, and glycogen stores. Complications associated with preoperative PN are rarely seen in previous studies. In order to prevent and mitigate the potential complications such as refeeding syndrome, optimal monitoring and early management of micronutrient deficiencies is required.

ASPEN Lipid Injectable Emulsion Safety Recommendations, Part 1: Background and Adult Considerations.

Lipid injectable emulsions (ILEs) are complex pharmaceutical formulations used as a source of energy and essential fatty acids in parenteral nutrition. Issues associated with ILE use are distinctly different from oral fat and arise from emulsion stability, dose, and infusion tolerance. Since 1975, soybean oil has been the consistent source oil used in ILE formulations in the US. Partly because of safety concerns with the soybean-based ILE and frequent and long-standing problems with product inventory shortages, new ILE products have become available. Gaps in ILE best practices create a risk for ILE safety errors in prescribing, compounding, and administration of these products. This paper provides information on appropriate indications, dosing, and methods to avoid potential errors with ILE products in the US. This paper (Part 1) will focus on ILE background, information, and recommendations for adult patients, whereas Part 2 of this series will focus on neonatal and pediatric patient-specific information.